“At no time did I lose possession of the ball”

Saturday October 10, 1925

After splitting the first two games of the 1925 World Series, the Washington Nationals returned home to host Game 3 against the Pittsburgh Pirates.

The Nats were ahead 4-3 heading into the top of the eighth inning, looking to take a 2-games-to-1 lead in the series. With two outs, Pittsburgh catcher Earl Smith hit a drive deep into the right field corner of Griffith Stadium. Right fielder and future Hall of Famer Sam Rice sprinted toward the right field line, leapt, and backhanded the ball in his glove as he tumbled into the stands. Moments later, Rice emerged with ball in hand. Smith was called out, and Washington went on to win the game.

There was some dispute from the Pirates as to whether Rice had actually caught the ball. The working theory for Pittsburgh was that he lost the ball in the crowd, but a helpful Washington rooter placed it back in his glove.

Rice seemed to enjoy the mystery surrounding the play. As the years went on, he never directly addressed the question of whether he caught the ball, often replying in a coy manner that “the umpire said he was out, so he was out.” He even refused to tell his wife and daughter the truth, obviously enjoying the mystery of the whole thing.

Instead of revealing the truth while alive, Rice left a sealed letter with the baseball Hall of Fame, to be opened upon his death. Finally, in October of 1974, the letter was opened, revealing that following:

“… the ball was a line drive headed for the bleachers towards right center, I turned slightly to my right and had the ball in view all the way, going at top speed and about 15 feet from bleachers jumped as high as I could and back handed and the ball hit the center of the pocket in glove (I had a death grip on it). I hit the ground about five feet from a barrier about four feet high in front of bleachers with all my brakes on but couldn’t stop so I tried to jump it to land in the crowd but my feet hit the barrier about a foot from top and I toppled over on my stomach into first row of bleachers, I hit my Adam’s apple on something which sort of knocked me out for a few seconds but McNeeley arrived about that time and grabbed me by the shirt and pulled me out. I remember trotting back towards the infield still carry in the ball for about halfway and then tossed it towards the pitcher’s mound. (How I have wished many times I had kept it.) At no time did I lose possession of the ball.”

Rice’s “revelation” was obviously written in a clever way as to keep the mystery surrounding the event. In fact, a Washington fan claiming to have been sitting in the front row that day claimed that Rice had indeed lost the ball.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “At no time did I lose possession of the ball”

  1. tgd says:

    Senators.

    Not “Nationals.”

    The nickname “Nats” grew out of headline writers’ need to compact the long name “Senators” into one-column headlines common in the day. So: chop off most of the first syllable and all of the last and you have “Nats” – Jjust as the Mariners are known as the “M’s” and the Indians as the “Tribe” in headlinese.

    For that matter, “Nats” was also shorthand for “insufferably bad” back in the day, just as “Cubs” is today… but we digress.

  2. Scot says:

    tgd: Thanks for reading and commenting.

    The official name of the franchise from 1905-1954 was “Washington Nationals” – they were only officially the Senators when Calvin Griffith changed the name before the 1955 season. If you look at their uniforms and logos, you will see that if any nickname is on them, it reads Nationals.

    It is true that the sportswriters and most fans referred to the team as Senators, and also Nats, which could have been short for either. I won’t argue that it was not common practice to call them the Senators – but the team was called the Nationals.

  3. Beau says:

    Scot, you should write a disclaimer somewhere on the site over how many times you have to explain this :)

  4. Scot says:

    Already working on it. I found this in the July 21, 1954 issue of The Sporting News:

    “EDITOR’S NOTE: Although the Washington Club has been known popularly as the Senators for many years, its name has officially been the Nationals. In referring to them as the Nationals, writers are only giving them their correct moniker, not attempting to rename them.”

    So it appears I am not alone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: